Re: Packaging LyX

2017-12-25 Thread ng0
Gammel Holte transcribed 2.0K bytes: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:42 PM, ng0 wrote: > > Thanks for your comments. I will address those before I circulate a patch. > > > Is this python-2 only? If not, could you explain why you picked 2 and not > 3 > > (2 is on its way out in 20 months). > > LyX i

Re: Packaging LyX

2017-12-22 Thread Gammel Holte
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 7:42 PM, ng0 wrote: Thanks for your comments. I will address those before I circulate a patch. > Is this python-2 only? If not, could you explain why you picked 2 and not 3 > (2 is on its way out in 20 months). LyX is sadly not ready for Python 3 yet. It will be soon, bu

Re: Packaging LyX

2017-12-22 Thread Gammel Holte
Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hmm, do the tests work for you? Back when I tried this was the blocker for > me... > Yes, they work fine. Aside, I've tested LyX for a few days and everything has worked as expected so far. After looking into all documentation, packages from other distros, and testi

Re: Packaging LyX

2017-12-22 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hmm, do the tests work for you? Back when I tried this was the blocker for me...

Re: Packaging LyX

2017-12-22 Thread ng0
Hi, Gammel Holte transcribed 5.8K bytes: > Hi all, > > I'm planning to switch a dozen or so machines to GuixSD. > > The only major package my users are missing is LyX (a LaTeX editor, see > https://www.lyx.org/) so I packaged it, and it works fine. See code below. > > I would appreciate some he