Re: Package page

2016-11-12 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hello, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes: > On 11/11/2016 06:41 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Adam Pribyl skribis: >> >>> The GuixSD package page >>> >>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/ >>> >>> is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to >>> list

Re: Package page

2016-11-12 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On 11/11/2016 06:41 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello! > > Adam Pribyl skribis: > >> The GuixSD package page >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/ >> >> is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to >> list all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with t

Re: Package page

2016-11-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Adam Pribyl skribis: > The GuixSD package page > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/ > > is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to > list all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with this? It’s a shame indeed and we should definitely add JS cod

Re: Package page

2016-11-11 Thread ng0
David Pirotte writes: > Hi, > >> Personally I'm in favor of erasing the /packages page (until we >> have an improved alternative), no one likes pages which kill your >> browser process > > FWIW, I still have a [very] low internet band, I'm using epiphany, and it > loads the > page in less then

Re: Package page

2016-11-11 Thread David Pirotte
Hi, > Personally I'm in favor of erasing the /packages page (until we > have an improved alternative), no one likes pages which kill your > browser process FWIW, I still have a [very] low internet band, I'm using epiphany, and it loads the page in less then a second here. I personnaly think it

Re: Package page

2016-11-11 Thread ng0
Adam Pribyl writes: > The GuixSD package page > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/ > > is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to > list all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with this? > > Adam Pribyl > > Yes, it's not ideal. We had some discussions