Re: New procedure to modify operating-system records

2025-03-26 Thread Rutherther
Hi Sergio, Sergio Pastor Pérez writes: > Rutherther writes: >> what I am asking is how this will be achieved - coverage of same use >> case. Possibly I am just missing something, so let's take guix system >> reconfigure as an example. Could you point where I am wrong in my >> reasoning? >> >>

Re: New procedure to modify operating-system records

2025-03-16 Thread Rutherther
Sergio Pastor Pérez writes: > Hello Rutherther! Thanks for showing interest. > > Rutherther writes: >> Hi, in case someone stumbled upon this thread in the future >> (probably me, who will again not save this to a known location >> and will come searching on the list archives :) ), >> >> OP ch

Re: New procedure to modify operating-system records

2025-03-16 Thread Rutherther
Hi, in case someone stumbled upon this thread in the future (probably me, who will again not save this to a known location and will come searching on the list archives :) ), OP changed their usernam on codeberg, so new url is here: https://codeberg.org/pastor/omega/src/branch/main/pastor/utils/

Re: New procedure to modify operating-system records

2024-06-30 Thread Sergio Pastor Pérez
Hi Ludo, thanks for taking a look! Ludovic Courtès writes: > So while I think the feature is much welcome, I believe we should strive > for an implementation that doesn’t break abstractions. I agree. I would rather have a procedure which respects abstractions. > As I mentioned earlier, one opt

Re: New procedure to modify operating-system records

2024-06-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Sergio, Sergio Pastor Pérez skribis: > I'm writing this mail from a system that grafts `mesa` for the > `nvidia-driver` available in [1]. Although I'm aware that this is not > the place to discuss proprietary stuff, this is not about running an > NVIDIA system. This enables any Guix user to a