On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> > Last I heard the IceCat binaries were a bit further behind.
> We use our own binaries though.
And I confirm they are up-to-date with respect to the icecat releases, which
seem to happen reason
Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> Last I heard the IceCat binaries were a bit further behind.
We use our own binaries though.
> I don't like the direction Firefox is heading, but we're a bit
> constrained by IceCat not being as up to date, especially in the world
> of fast and furious "new we
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> there are a number of sites for which I still need to use iceweasel, since
>> icecat will not work on them.
>
> AFAIK the main difference between these two is the set of plugins
> installed by default. Otherwise it’s essentially the same thing
Andreas Enge skribis:
> there are a number of sites for which I still need to use iceweasel, since
> icecat will not work on them.
AFAIK the main difference between these two is the set of plugins
installed by default. Otherwise it’s essentially the same thing.
> the following error message is
