¡Hola!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> For the current solution (avoiding a full rebuild), see commit
>> 61dc82d9b90d0545739c30bfc33003bd062071f0. LilyPond could hard-code the
>> file name of ‘gsc’.
>
> This looks like too much work to
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
> > the following commit
> > commit eb354bdacbf4154ec66038dac07f19bf4ced1fad
> > Author: Ludovic Courtès
> > Date: Mon May 9 15:54:34 2016 +0200
> >
> > gnu: ghostscript: Do not build the st
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> For the current solution (avoiding a full rebuild), see commit
> 61dc82d9b90d0545739c30bfc33003bd062071f0. LilyPond could hard-code the
> file name of ‘gsc’.
This looks like too much work to implement for each package sepa
Hi!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> the following commit
> commit eb354bdacbf4154ec66038dac07f19bf4ced1fad
> Author: Ludovic Courtès
> Date: Mon May 9 15:54:34 2016 +0200
>
> gnu: ghostscript: Do not build the statically-linked 'gs' binary.
>
> * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> the following commit
> commit eb354bdacbf4154ec66038dac07f19bf4ced1fad
> Author: Ludovic Courtès
> Date: Mon May 9 15:54:34 2016 +0200
>
> gnu: ghostscript: Do not build the statically-linked 'gs' binary.
>
> * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghost