Felix Lechner schreef op vr 17-06-2022 om 13:11 [-0700]:
> > If you are already in California, [...], but if you don't and
> > simply
> > Apple needs to appeal to international
> > law enforcement or your country in particular, whichever is easier.
>
> I generally think of license violations as ci
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:07 AM Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> If $local_country makes all software free, such a
> clause would likely be illegal in $local_country and thus unenforcible.
A country would likely engage in such a wholesale disenfranchisement
as a last step, and not the first, after r
(zimoun pointed out that I didn't actually send this mail, apparently
it never left ‘drafts’. Anyway, just sending this e-mail for
completeness; unless someone comes with a new insight or something the
discussion appears to be done for now.)
Philip McGrath schreef op do 16-06-2022 om 02:21 [-0400
Doesn't seem to reach some kind of consensus, or maybe there's actually
some consensus for considering APSL-2.0 acceptable (albeit suboptimal)
for Guix but I'm to biased to see it :p, so I suppose continue with
status quo (i.e.: allow APSL-2.0)?
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 17-06-2022 om 12:00 [+0200]:
> Am Freitag, dem 17.06.2022 um 11:39 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> > The clause is also rather extra-territorial: what if $local_country
> > reforms copyright to make all sofware free, if we accepted ‘go to
> > this jurisdiction clau
Hi,
On Friday, June 17, 2022 10:37:07 AM EDT zimoun wrote:
>
> On the other hand, I refuse to judge the intent behind a software. It
> appears to me a slippery slope. The only way is to set a clear frame
> and then scrutinize using this very frame. Debian defines a frame, GNU
> defines anothe
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 11:39, Maxime Devos wrote:
> TBC, did you see my previous mail about cherry-picking and power
> assymetry.
No. And I do not see it in the public archive.
> I would like to refer to some blog article about something along the
> lines ’free software is not about lice
Am Freitag, dem 17.06.2022 um 11:39 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> The clause is also rather extra-territorial: what if $local_country
> reforms copyright to make all sofware free, if we accepted ‘go to
> this jurisdiction clauses’, then opponents could effectively block
> the legally-enforced freei
zimoun schreef op vr 17-06-2022 om 11:06 [+0200]:
> [...] How do we resolve the disagreements?
By talking on guix-devel.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
TBC, did you see my previous mail about cherry-picking and power
assymetry.
> FWIW, I think that adopting a different (more stringent) license
> policy hits two issues:
>
> 1. Where do you draw the line? Based on which concrete principles
> to decide for this or for that?
I would like to
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 18:02, Philip McGrath wrote:
> I don't want to speak for Maxime, but AIUI the question was whether Guix
> ought
> to continue to accept all licenses on that list, or instead ought adopt some
> different (more stringent?) license policy.
FWIW, I think that adopting
Hi,
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 3:43:39 AM EDT Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> Am Donnerstag, dem 16.06.2022 um 02:21 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:
> > Hi Guix,
> >
> > Is the Apple Public Source License 2.0 (APSL-2.0 [1]) a free license
> > according to Guix's standards?
>
> While
Hi Philip,
Am Donnerstag, dem 16.06.2022 um 02:21 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:
> Hi Guix,
>
> Is the Apple Public Source License 2.0 (APSL-2.0 [1]) a free license
> according to Guix's standards?
While it isn't included in the free licenses list the FSF publishes,
from your note [6] I would gue
13 matches
Mail list logo
