Heya,
On Mon Dec 12, 2022 at 1:43 AM GMT, Mekeor Melire wrote:
> Or auto-fill-mode? :)
I'm pretty new to Emacs, so I dunno which way is best -.o.-
> Personally, I felt kind of fooled at that point, because it felt
> like I had made needless efforts to read an irrelevant code
> snippet.
Fair e
Hi,
On +2022-12-09 17:25:35 +, ( wrote:
> Heya,
>
> On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 9:32 AM GMT, wrote:
> > How does a gullible noob like me know what the dangers might be, (e.g.
> > http:)
> > and how to avoid (most of) them by finding a guix version that has been
> > gone through with a fine-tooth
2022-12-11 10:08 pa...@disroot.org:
On Sat Dec 10, 2022 at 9:25 PM GMT, Mekeor Melire wrote:
> By the way, the text does not seem to strictly fill columns at
> a certain line width. So I did not bother to fill columns in
> the "patch".
Right, I should set up FILL-COLUMNS-INDICATOR... :)
O
Heya,
On Sat Dec 10, 2022 at 9:25 PM GMT, Mekeor Melire wrote:
> I think it'd also be fine to come up with the titles during the process of
> writing as sometimes that process itself is insightful. E.g. I could imagine
> parts 2 and 4 to collapse. Maybe, maybe not, you'll see.
Perhaps. I think
2022-12-08 18:24 pa...@disroot.org:
> Some of you may have seen on IRC that I've been writing a post for the Guix
> blog that I hope will form the first part of a series. This series aims to
> dissect the internals of Guix, from bottom to top.
Great, I'm looking forward to read it! Especially,
Heya,
On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 9:32 AM GMT, wrote:
> How does a gullible noob like me know what the dangers might be, (e.g. http:)
> and how to avoid (most of) them by finding a guix version that has been
> gone through with a fine-tooth comb by trusted guix devs and has been
> re-hosted at gitlab o
Hi,
On +2022-12-09 07:33:16 +, ( wrote:
> On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM GMT, 宋文武 wrote:
> > I think it's missing what "build-derivations" do, or "Part 0: Store".
>
> Hmm, do you mean adding an example of building a derivation in Scheme with
> ``build-derivations''? I'll definitiely add that
On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM GMT, 宋文武 wrote:
> I think it's missing what "build-derivations" do, or "Part 0: Store".
Hmm, do you mean adding an example of building a derivation in Scheme with
``build-derivations''? I'll definitiely add that :)
-- (
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
"(" writes:
> Heya!
>
> Some of you may have seen on IRC that I've been writing a post for the Guix
> blog that I hope will form the first part of a series. This series aims to
> dissect the internals of Guix, from bottom to top. Perhaps they could go in
> the cookbook once the series is done?
