Benz Schenk writes:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:01:23 +0200
> Roel Janssen wrote:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Benz Schenk skribis:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:37:00 +0200
>> >> Roel Janssen wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> [...]
>> >>
>> >> I adapted your patc
Benz Schenk skribis:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:01:23 +0200
> Roel Janssen wrote:
[...]
>> There's only one thing:
>> Would it make more sense to stick to the chronology of the generations
>> (sorting them before displaying them)?
>
> IMO it's useful to see the diffs in reverse when before switc
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:01:23 +0200
Roel Janssen wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Benz Schenk skribis:
> >
> >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:37:00 +0200
> >> Roel Janssen wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> [...]
> >>
> >> I adapted your patch to hopefully implement the desired beha
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> Benz Schenk skribis:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:37:00 +0200
>> Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> The attached patch implements this behavior. However, because I use
>>> @code{previous-generation-number} to determine which generation to diff
>>> with, the fo
Hi!
Benz Schenk skribis:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:37:00 +0200
> Roel Janssen wrote:
[...]
>> The attached patch implements this behavior. However, because I use
>> @code{previous-generation-number} to determine which generation to diff
>> with, the following will not provide a diff as expect
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:37:00 +0200
Roel Janssen wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Roel Janssen skribis:
> >
> >> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> [...]
> >>
> >> Ah, sorry, I forgot about this. This makes sense. But then, what should
> >> we
> >> see when we do:
> >>
>From 7864ff2443f99fb227e90d0d176a977a30c88faa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:31:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] guix package: Display generation diffs.
* guix/ui.scm (display-profile-content-diff): New variable.
* guix/scripts/package.scm (process-query): Use dis
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> I think what I’m suggesting is that the first matching generation should
>> be displayed in full using ‘display-profile-content’, and subsequent
>> generations would be displayed as a diff.
>>
>> Thus, when viewing a single generation, as
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I don’t think so. The old behavior will always be available by
>>> specifying a single generation anyway:
>>>
>>> guix package --list-generations=42
>>>
>>> It may be worth mentioning this in the manu
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> I don’t think so. The old behavior will always be available by
>> specifying a single generation anyway:
>>
>> guix package --list-generations=42
>>
>> It may be worth mentioning this in the manual.
>>
>> My understanding of the discus
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Roel Janssen writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
In the discussion that ensued, it seems there was a consensus to provide
only the diff format:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00385
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Roel Janssen writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> In the discussion that ensued, it seems there was a consensus to provide
>>> only the diff format:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00385.html
>>>
>>> So it seems all the lights
Roel Janssen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi Roel!
>>
>> I realized we have not applied this --list-generations patch of yours,
>> which is a pity. So…
>>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> Vincent Legoll writes:
>>>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Roel!
>
> I realized we have not applied this --list-generations patch of yours,
> which is a pity. So…
>
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Vincent Legoll writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
--list-generations=full
>
Hi Roel!
I realized we have not applied this --list-generations patch of yours,
which is a pity. So…
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Vincent Legoll writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> --list-generations=full
I think keeping a way to see all generati
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Hartmut Goebel
wrote:
> I agree with this as a general principle, of course. However, my
> experience is that currently -l is hardly usable in practice, because it
> spits out way too many lines.
>
> +1
Ah, I don't have a lot of packages in my profiles bec
Am 05.09.2016 um 00:12 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> I agree with this as a general principle, of course. However, my
> experience is that currently -l is hardly usable in practice, because it
> spits out way too many lines.
+1
--
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> --list-generations=full
>>>
>>> I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool
>>
>> --list-generations would still display all the generations. Or did you
>> mean “a way to see *the
Vincent Legoll writes:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> --list-generations=full
>>>
>>> I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool
>>
>> --list-generations would still display all the generations. Or did you
>> mean “a way to see *the c
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> --list-generations=full
>>
>> I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool
>
> --list-generations would still display all the generations. Or did you
> mean “a way to see *the content* of each generation”?
I'm
Vincent Legoll skribis:
--list-generations=full
>
> I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool
--list-generations would still display all the generations. Or did you
mean “a way to see *the content* of each generation”?
Ludo’.
Hello
>>> --list-generations=full
I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool
--
Vincent Legoll
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi Roel,
>>
>> I’ve just tried the patch and I think it’s awesome! I’ve also always
>> been dissatisfied with what ‘--list-generations’ provides—it’s
>> inconvenient as soon as you have more than a handful packages.
>>
>> Perhaps we could add
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Roel,
>
> I’ve just tried the patch and I think it’s awesome! I’ve also always
> been dissatisfied with what ‘--list-generations’ provides—it’s
> inconvenient as soon as you have more than a handful packages.
>
> Perhaps we could add an optional argument to --list-ge
Hi Roel,
I’ve just tried the patch and I think it’s awesome! I’ve also always
been dissatisfied with what ‘--list-generations’ provides—it’s
inconvenient as soon as you have more than a handful packages.
Perhaps we could add an optional argument to --list-generations where:
--list-generations
25 matches
Mail list logo
