Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-06 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
> Does that still happen after ‘make clean-go && make’? No, it does work after that. Weird... Thanks!

Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > 894: 5 [thunk] > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 387: 4 [eval # #] > 387: 3 [eval # #] > 387: 2 [eval # #] > 387: 1 [eval # #] > In unknown file: >?: 0 [struct-ref # 1] > > ERROR: In procedure struct-ref: > ERROR: In procedure struct-ref: Wrong type argument in positi

Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-06 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Ludo, On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:36:34 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > index 1d577c7..44ab171 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > > @@ -43,6 +43

Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > index 1d577c7..44ab171 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ >#:use-module (guix build-system trivial) >#:use-module (gnu packages) >#:use-m

Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-04 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Ludo, On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:37:52 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > You should now be able to add #:use-module (gnu packages cross-base) in > admin.scm. Yes. However, now I get In unknown file: ?: 18 [primitive-load "/x/home/dannym/src/guix/scripts/guix"] In guix/ui.scm: 1220:

Re: Circular dependencies in gnu/packages, weird error message

2016-11-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > I cannot import (gnu packages cross-base) in (gnu packages admin) (it gave an > incomprehensible-to-me error message [*]). What could be the cause? Some (gnu packages …) modules were referring to bindings from other modules at the top level, which doesn’t pla