On 7 December 2024 21:06:01 UTC, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>It's not going to fix your build
…I mean, in the sense that the instructions you followed are not 'wrong',
AFAIK. If it fixes anything that's a side-effect.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Hi,
On 7 December 2024 17:23:13 UTC, Tobias Alexandra Platen
wrote:
>I tried to build guix from git, when I noticed the failed build with:
>Error: Could not set character size
>make[2]: *** [Makefile:7547: doc/images/service-graph.png] Error 1
>I am following this manual page:
>https://guix.gnu.
Hi,
Looks like it's working.
I was able to complete the "building from git" section of the documentation
after an update of guix.
Thanks everyone.
Le sam. 9 sept. 2023 à 11:01, Simon Tournier a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 at 19:45, wolf wrote:
>
> >> The Makefile does not run ‘guix gi
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 at 19:45, wolf wrote:
>> The Makefile does not run ‘guix git authenticate’ using ./pre-inst-env.
>> And that’s probably to ensure the source of trust. If one corrupt the
>> commit that is built, then ’make authenticate’ would authenticate the
>> corruption because it wou
Hi both of you (I'm replying to both at the same time),
wolf writes:
On 2023-09-08 11:47:56 +0200, Wojtek Kosior wrote:
> Hello Josselin
>
> > wolf writes:
> >
> > > Hmm, but the recipe for the authenticate rule comes from the (possibly)
> > > compromised source, no? So the attacker can just
On 2023-09-08 11:47:56 +0200, Wojtek Kosior wrote:
> Hello Josselin
>
> > wolf writes:
> >
> > > Hmm, but the recipe for the authenticate rule comes from the (possibly)
> > > compromised source, no? So the attacker can just modify the recipe
> > > instead of
> > > the command going the authent
Hello Josselin
> wolf writes:
>
> > Hmm, but the recipe for the authenticate rule comes from the (possibly)
> > compromised source, no? So the attacker can just modify the recipe instead
> > of
> > the command going the authentication. Am I missing something?
>
> You can use a previously t
Hi,
wolf writes:
> Hmm, but the recipe for the authenticate rule comes from the (possibly)
> compromised source, no? So the attacker can just modify the recipe instead of
> the command going the authentication. Am I missing something?
You can use a previously trusted guix to do the authentica
On 2023-09-07 14:06:05 +0200, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 at 11:03, Nicolas Débonnaire
> wrote:
>
> > guix shell -D guix --pure
> > ./bootstrap
> > ./configure --localstatedir=/var --syscondir=/etc
> > make
>
> [...]
>
> > Error: fontconfig:Didn't find expected font fa
Hi,
On 2023-09-07 13:06, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 at 11:03, Nicolas Débonnaire
> wrote:
>
>> guix shell -D guix --pure
>> ./bootstrap
>> ./configure --localstatedir=/var --syscondir=/etc
>> make
>
> [...]
>
>> Error: fontconfig:Didn't find expected font family. Per
Hi,
On Sat, 02 Sep 2023 at 11:03, Nicolas Débonnaire wrote:
> guix shell -D guix --pure
> ./bootstrap
> ./configure --localstatedir=/var --syscondir=/etc
> make
[...]
> Error: fontconfig:Didn't find expected font family. Perhaps URW Type 1
> fonts need installing?
Hum, weird. That’s because
> guix shell -D guix --pure
>
> [...]
>
> Then if I run make authenticate as stated in the documentation it
> fails with the error: guix: command not found.
It appears you were still within the guix shell spawned with the first
command when you tried to run `make authenticate`. Guix was not
avai
12 matches
Mail list logo
