Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for
>> > which we don’t know?
>> FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would e
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for
> > which we don’t know?
> FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would entail
> more rebuilding, but i
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Commit 2e88d11 suggests that dbus-glib-1.pc mentions GLib and DBus.
> That’s one of the two criteria that we use to add propagate inputs.
> So that part of the commit is OK.
>
> As for removing DBus and GLib as inputs of the other packages, it’s
> really a
Commit 2e88d11 suggests that dbus-glib-1.pc mentions GLib and DBus.
That’s one of the two criteria that we use to add propagate inputs.
So that part of the commit is OK.
As for removing DBus and GLib as inputs of the other packages, it’s
really a question of whether the package uses them directly
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 07:17:35PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> The only change you actually made to messaging.scm in this commit was to
> add your copyright notice.
That was a mistake, I intended to make the change announced in the commit
message. Probably a consequence of juggling with too many
Andreas Enge writes:
> andreas pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 2e88d113aac31dbea0b998fca92b35dbfc998872
> Author: Andreas Enge
> Date: Sat May 23 16:43:18 2015 +0200
>
> gnu: dbus-glib: Propagate inputs dbus and glib.
>
> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (
