Alex Griffin skribis:
> I tried building with --rounds=4 on my GuixSD machine, but it errored
> out after the first build with the same error. Then I tried building
> with --check on my Debian machine and it succeeded.
Maybe it’s a different derivation that --rounds complained about.
Notably, t
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 05:36:19PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> > I tried building with --rounds=4 on my GuixSD machine, but it errored
> > out after the first build with the same error. Then I tried building
> > with --check on my Deb
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> I tried building with --rounds=4 on my GuixSD machine, but it errored
> out after the first build with the same error. Then I tried building
> with --check on my Debian machine and it succeeded.
>
> Last night on IRC we were discussin
I tried building with --rounds=4 on my GuixSD machine, but it errored
out after the first build with the same error. Then I tried building
with --check on my Debian machine and it succeeded.
Last night on IRC we were discussing this more and I think Leo was going
to try incorporating something fro
Leo Famulari skribis:
> Can you try building with '#:parallel-tests? #f', as shown in this link?
I was also going to suggest something along these lines.
Could you try building with with --rounds=4, say, on your machine? (Or
--check if it’s already there.)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:30:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 06:37:28PM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> > This package builds fine on my Debian system but not on GuixSD. I've
> > attached my build output, since it seems you're having trouble.
>
> [...]
>
> > ==
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 06:37:28PM -0500, Alex Griffin wrote:
> This package builds fine on my Debian system but not on GuixSD. I've
> attached my build output, since it seems you're having trouble.
[...]
> ==
> FAIL: test_nonexi
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:04:53PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
> >
> > I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
> > satisfying t
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
>
> I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
> satisfying the linter, and updating anything that had received an upstream
> update since
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
>
> I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
> satisfying the linter, and updating anything that had received an upstream
> update sinc
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:26:39PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> * gnu/packages/music.scm (beets): New variable.
I did a final cleaning pass incorporating reviewers' suggestions,
satisfying the linter, and updating anything that had received an upstream
update since I started.
Good thing, because
11 matches
Mail list logo