Hi Manolis,
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> This is the updated patch. I have tested it as suggested and it works.
Great!
(In the future, could you quote the relevant parts of the message you’re
replying to? Otherwise I have to search a little bit to find the
context, which increases delay, frus
Hello,
On 07/20/16 10:16, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There's a lot of things specific to hurd in there, wouldn't that better
> be located in a separate hurd.scm or something like that ?
>
Well in the way I handle it in the patch, cross-libc no longer contains
any headers at all. Cross-
Hello,
There's a lot of things specific to hurd in there, wouldn't that better
be located in a separate hurd.scm or something like that ?
--
Vincent Legoll
Hello Ludo,
This is the updated patch. I have tested it as suggested and it works.
It applies on core-updates-next.
Thank you,
Manolis
From e599bc5b7208be48d4fff0868fb3b53a964dae11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manolis Ragkousis
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:15:00 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: cross-
Hi!
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> On 06/12/16 19:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Could you move this procedure, as well as xgnumach-headers and co., to
>> the top level? That way there’d be less “clutter” in the definition of
>> ‘cross-libc’ itself. WDYT?
>
> I created (guix build cross-base) whi
Hello,
Here is the updated patch.
On 06/12/16 19:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Could you move this procedure, as well as xgnumach-headers and co., to
> the top level? That way there’d be less “clutter” in the definition of
> ‘cross-libc’ itself. WDYT?
I created (guix build cross-base) which exp
Hi!
Manolis Ragkousis skribis:
> The previous version of my patch was not using target to correctly
> determine which glibc to inherit. It was using %current-target-system
> which caused me many problems.
>
> With this version I modified it to use cross-libc-for-target so there
> will not be any
Hello everyone,
The previous version of my patch was not using target to correctly
determine which glibc to inherit. It was using %current-target-system
which caused me many problems.
With this version I modified it to use cross-libc-for-target so there
will not be any problems in case %current-t
