Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> From 44bcbdb30f6789d4bc460aa84dca27321c074cba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 23:50:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sicp.
>
> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (sicp): New variable.
Applied with minor changes:
> +(versio
Alex Kost skribis:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen (2016-05-20 14:26 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer" writes:
>>
>>> This modified `scheme-indent-function' by Mark Weaver fixes that:
>>
>> Wow, that helps :-) Thank you!
>>
>> I can't seem to find it in Guix git; should I look better or shoul
Jan Nieuwenhuizen (2016-05-20 14:26 +0300) wrote:
> Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer" writes:
>
>> This modified `scheme-indent-function' by Mark Weaver fixes that:
>
> Wow, that helps :-) Thank you!
>
> I can't seem to find it in Guix git; should I look better or should we
> link to it somehow?
The
Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer" writes:
> This modified `scheme-indent-function' by Mark Weaver fixes that:
Wow, that helps :-) Thank you!
I can't seem to find it in Guix git; should I look better or should we
link to it somehow?
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Fre
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>>> +(arguments
>>> + `(#:modules ((guix build utils)
>>> + (srfi srfi-1)
>>> + (srfi srfi-26))
>>> + #:builder
>>
>> #:builder should be aligned with #:modules.
>
> Sure, missed this. Edited by hand for now.
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hi Ludovic
> What about putting it in (gnu packages scheme) instead? Sounds like a
> natural home.
Sure.
>> +(version "2016-02-20")
> Could you change the ‘version’ field according to the conventions
> described at (info "(guix) Version Numbers")? Since there’s no
Hi!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
> Too lazy to get up and go for my book shelf, I was presently surprised
> that SICP is available in info; and even more surprised it hasn't been
> packaged yet.
Indeed! :-)
> From 85c7f3d9ba64989b2fbdba9ee0a0da6c635b1d3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nie
