Marius Bakke (2016-09-12 15:09 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke (2016-08-17 16:18 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> ..and here is a patch that moves tre.scm over as well. The code is
>>> unchanged apart from license: prefix.
>>>
>>> From 8e673ebd8c68c3a92fa60b56068339c011607752 Mon Sep 17 0
Alex Kost writes:
> Marius Bakke (2016-08-17 16:18 +0100) wrote:
>
>> ..and here is a patch that moves tre.scm over as well. The code is
>> unchanged apart from license: prefix.
>>
>> From 8e673ebd8c68c3a92fa60b56068339c011607752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Marius Bakke
>> Date: Wed, 17 Au
Marius Bakke (2016-08-17 16:18 +0100) wrote:
> ..and here is a patch that moves tre.scm over as well. The code is
> unchanged apart from license: prefix.
>
> From 8e673ebd8c68c3a92fa60b56068339c011607752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marius Bakke
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:10:15 +0100
> Subje
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:35:14AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> I agree that having both 'tre' and 're2' packages in "regex.scm" is the
> right thing. Also I think it would be good to move 'oniguruma' there.
>
> As for "pcre.scm", I would also move its content to "regex.scm". What
> about 'ghc-pcre
Leo Famulari writes:
> When moving packages around, all users of the package need to have their
> module imports updated. Copyright attribution must be carefully handled.
> And merging the various *-updates branches into master and vice versa
> becomes more complicated and prone to error.
Perhap
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:18:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>> > Leo Famulari writes:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does
Leo Famulari (2016-08-18 23:43 +0300) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:18:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>> > Leo Famulari writes:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:18:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
> > Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
> >>> fully implement PCRE s
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >>
> >> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
> >> fully implement PCRE so pcre.scm seems inappropriate. Pe
Marius Bakke writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>>
>>> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
>>> fully implement PCRE so pcre.scm seems inappropriate. Perhaps that could
>>> be renamed to regex.scm
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>
>> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
>> fully implement PCRE so pcre.scm seems inappropriate. Perhaps that could
>> be renamed to regex.scm or similar.
>
> The patch look
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>
> I wasn't sure where to put this, so went with its own file. It does not
> fully implement PCRE so pcre.scm seems inappropriate. Perhaps that could
> be renamed to regex.scm or similar.
The patch looks good, but please put it in reg
12 matches
Mail list logo
