Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-gunicorn and python2-gunicorn.

2016-09-13 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 13.09.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Leo Famulari: > Thanks for this! Regarding the naming question, I think it's fine to > call it 'gunicorn'. Prefixing with 'python-' is more appropriate for > libraries and other "helper" packages, whereas user facing or > standalone applications can use the plain upst

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-gunicorn and python2-gunicorn.

2016-09-13 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:50:35PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > * gnu/packages/web.scm (python-gunicorn, python2-gunicorn): New > variables. Thanks for this! Regarding the naming question, I think it's fine to call it 'gunicorn'. Prefixing with 'python-' is more appropriate for libraries and o

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-gunicorn and python2-gunicorn.

2016-09-12 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 11.09.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Hartmut Goebel: > * gnu/packages/web.scm (python-gunicorn, python2-gunicorn): New Since this is a wsgi/http *server* maybe the package should be named just "gunicorn"? Opinions, please. -- Schönen Gruß Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 2700