Troy Sankey skribis:
> Quoting ng0 (2016-07-11 12:35:49)
>> The patch below reads okay to me, could you add your name or
>> nickname in the section of guix.texi where document author names
>> are included, if applicable (ie if your name is missing before
>> this edit)?
>
> Attached patch includes
Quoting ng0 (2016-07-11 12:35:49)
> The patch below reads okay to me, could you add your name or
> nickname in the section of guix.texi where document author names
> are included, if applicable (ie if your name is missing before
> this edit)?
Attached patch includes my name.
Troy
From 6381b62a377
Hi,
Troy Sankey writes:
> Quoting Leo Famulari (2016-07-10 19:16:30)
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
>> > When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the
>> > .git
>> > directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix h
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> Hashing sources is becoming quite compilated! I can't wait until 'guix
> download' supports git, then this could be automated.
In that case, `guix download` would need to take a Git hash as an
argument.
In general, I think it's a goo
Yes, that is how I understand it previously did not work for me.
Thanks :)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> Quoting Pjotr Prins (2016-07-10 20:13:26)
> > And only now I am understanding a problem ages ago. Would this also be
> > the reason for git sub-modules not to w
Quoting Pjotr Prins (2016-07-10 20:13:26)
> And only now I am understanding a problem ages ago. Would this also be
> the reason for git sub-modules not to work?
Pjotr,
If I'm understanding correctly, you failed to generate the hash of a git
repository containing submodules? In that case, you may
Quoting Leo Famulari (2016-07-10 19:16:30)
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> > When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
> > directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
> > page in the documentation.
>
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:16:30PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> > When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
> > directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
> > page in t
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
> directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
> page in the documentation.
Yes! This is one that *everybody* has to ask.
I th
