On 10/07/16 05:43, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
The patch LGTM otherwise, except that I would unpack 'ORF' and use the
term 'ribo-seq' in the description. I've never looking at ribo-seq data
before and I'm not familiar, so I wasn't sure what 'ribosome profiling'
meant exactly
Ben Woodcroft writes:
>> I think in the ribotaper/bedtools case we should just name the variable
>> “bedtools-2.18” and make it public.
>
> I agree with should call it 'bedtools-2.18' and make it public (but with
> a comment explaining why the old version is kept), just as in e.g.
> 'python-f
On 07/07/16 23:45, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
On 07/07/16 19:26, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Guix,
this patch adds a bioinformatics tool called "Ribotaper". It needs a somewhat
older version of bedtools, because the output format produced by bedtools
changed after version 2.
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> On 07/07/16 19:26, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> this patch adds a bioinformatics tool called "Ribotaper". It needs a
>> somewhat
>> older version of bedtools, because the output format produced by bedtools
>> changed after version 2.18.0 (they don't seem to c
On 07/07/16 19:26, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Guix,
this patch adds a bioinformatics tool called "Ribotaper". It needs a somewhat
older version of bedtools, because the output format produced by bedtools
changed after version 2.18.0 (they don't seem to care about semantic
versioning). This is
