Andreas Enge writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> +(license license:gpl3)))
>
> From the text printed on the license page you give, it should be gpl3+.
> Otherwise it looks good, pleas push!
You are of course right! Will push with that change.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> +(license license:gpl3)))
>From the text printed on the license page you give, it should be gpl3+.
Otherwise it looks good, pleas push!
Andreas
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> The author has told me that the license is GPLv3; the website will be
> updated accordingly. I will change the license field as soon as the
> change is publicly visible.
The license is now officially declared to be GPLv3:
http://rseqc.sourceforge.net/#license
Atta
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> The license isn't very clear. The Google Code website[1] lists the
> license as "GPLv3", but nowhere in the source is the license version
> specified. "PKG-INFO" declares "License :: GPL", whereas
> "./doc/COPYING" contains the MIT license. It's all pretty messy, so I
