l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> In place of a road map, here’s my take at a relatively detailed list of
> things that I think we should have for 1.0 to satisfy a range of use
> cases, and things that can happen later:
Committed.
Ludo’.
Omar Radwan skribis:
> I think we need to rewrite the roadmap from scratch.
In place of a road map, here’s my take at a relatively detailed list of
things that I think we should have for 1.0 to satisfy a range of use
cases, and things that can happen later:
* Features scheduled for 1.0
- lar
>I’m tempted to remove the file >altogether, because that’s not really the
>preferred way to communicate about >this, and is bound to become
>outdated.
I think removing it is a bad idea because a roadmap gives you an idea of
what is planning to be implemented and the goal. Estimations make people
Omar Radwan skribis:
> I was browsing the guix git tree the other day, and I was reading the
> ROADMAP file, and I found it extremely outdated. It talks about Guix 1.0
> being released in time for GNU's 30th anniversary. I think it needs a
> rewrite
Yeah. (Though it also starts with two paragra
I was browsing the guix git tree the other day, and I was reading the
ROADMAP file, and I found it extremely outdated. It talks about Guix 1.0
being released in time for GNU's 30th anniversary. I think it needs a
rewrite
