Hi Vagrant,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:08:59PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far
> got pretty good results:
>
> Using guix (and packages) built from commit:
> f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737
>
> $ guix challenge --v
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Eventually, I'd like to do more systematic test of guix packages, with
>> published logs per-package, rather than whatever I happened to build on
>> the system so far, but this was a quick start to help flesh out ideas
>> for feature requests to "guix challenge" to mak
Hi Vagrant!
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far
> got pretty good results:
>
> Using guix (and packages) built from commit:
>
> f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737
>
> $ guix challenge --verbose --diff=diffoscope ...
> 2,463 s
I did some quick reproducibility testing running GNU Guix, and so far
got pretty good results:
Using guix (and packages) built from commit:
f83d07f7778b699d46741a5667113342f5f0a737
$ guix challenge --verbose --diff=diffoscope ...
2,463 store items were analyzed:
- 2,016 (81.9%) were identica
