Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > Very unusal. I'm wondering if it's caused by my use of > 'call-with-connected-session/auth' from (gnu tests ssh) rather than > 'open-ssh-session' in (guix ssh). That's the main difference between > the test suite and 'guix deploy' in ter

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Could it be that the VM died in the middle of the SSH session? Where > does SIGTERM (15) come from? The SIGTERM comes from my less-than-ideal way of spinning up marionettes outside of the derivation that carries out the srfi-64 tests, 'call-with-marionette'. I have a li

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Ludovic Courtès writes: > I finally got around to working on it: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36162 > > Let me know what you think! Thanks for implementing it :) Not sure if you saw, but I sent two emails regarding the patch series to guix-patches. They're down at the bottom of that

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Hi Jakob, zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> OK, sounds good. >> >> Some time ago, I proposed to have ‘remove-eval’ where you could do: >> >> (remote-eval #~(begin …) #:session …) >> >> which would take care of building and copying everyt

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Hi, zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > ;;; [2019/06/11 10:25:54.534378, 2] channel_request: Channel request exec > success > ;;; [2019/06/11 10:25:54.593719, 2] grow_window: growing window (channel > 43:0) to 128 bytes > qemu-system-x86_64: terminating on signal 1

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > It seems likely that the SSH issue I was dealing was being caused by > the store being read-only. I'll investigate that today and report > back. Sorry it took so long. It took me some significant time yesterday to figure out how the hig

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Ludovic Courtès writes: > OK, sounds good. > > Some time ago, I proposed to have ‘remove-eval’ where you could do: > > (remote-eval #~(begin …) #:session …) > > which would take care of building and copying everything the gexp > refers to (see >

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Hello Jakob, zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis: > As a quick refresher, my GSoC project this summer is 'guix deploy', a > deployment automation tool for GuixSD that's been discussed more > thoroughly in [1] and [2]. Development has taken place on my personal > branch of G

Re: Progress on 'guix deploy'

Jakob L. Kreuze writes: > Hello, Guix! > > Apart from a few patches and my introductory email about a month ago, > I've been pretty silent. I feel it's time to finally break that silence, > let people know where progress has been made, and request some feedback > on the code I've written so far.

Progress on 'guix deploy'

Hello, Guix! Apart from a few patches and my introductory email about a month ago, I've been pretty silent. I feel it's time to finally break that silence, let people know where progress has been made, and request some feedback on the code I've written so far. As a quick refresher, my GSoC projec