Hello!
Timothy Sample skribis:
> I sent https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68769. Now I see that I didn’t have
> the newest Git hooks installed, so no change ID and no email to the
> relevant team. Sorry! (I use worktrees so the Makefile didn’t fix this
> for me automatically – I should have double
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Thumbs up on bzip2 support! We should update Disarchive in Guix but
> perhaps that’s already in your pipeline?
I sent https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68769. Now I see that I didn’t have
the newest Git hooks installed, so no change ID and no email to the
relevant team. So
Hi Timothy!
Timothy Sample skribis:
> The permalink is https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2024-01-26, but you can
> link to the latest report, too: https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/latest/.
Yay!
> New in this edition is checking for Subversion sources and
> bzip2-compressed tarballs. Subversion is we
Hello all,
For a while now, I’ve been tracking coverage of Guix sources in the
Software Heritage (SWH) archive. I maintain a dataset of sources that
goes back (almost five years) to Guix 1.0.0. Every once in a while, I
update this dataset and check it against SWH to see how much is missing.
I ju
