Re: Please review: documentation for python build system

2016-11-15 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 15.11.2016 um 09:24 schrieb Chris Marusich: > My comments below are primarily grammatical or stylistic. I hope you > find my feedback helpful. Thank you very much. That's exactly the kind of feedback I also wanted. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compile

Re: Please review: documentation for python build system

2016-11-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Hartmut, Hartmut Goebel skribis: > we are about to merge the wip-python-build-system. I'd like to add some > commentary there explaining how the different install methods of Python > behave. This could save someone else the effort of anaylsing and testing > this again is some questions about

Re: Please review: documentation for python build system

2016-11-15 Thread Catonano
2016-11-15 9:24 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich : > Hi Hartmut! > > Thank you very much for the documentation. It is quite clear, and it > helps clarify the background and intent of the new python build system. > My comments below are primarily grammatical or stylistic. I hope you > find my feedback he

Re: Please review: documentation for python build system

2016-11-15 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Hartmut! Thank you very much for the documentation. It is quite clear, and it helps clarify the background and intent of the new python build system. My comments below are primarily grammatical or stylistic. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Hartmut Goebel writes: > In Python there are

Please review: documentation for python build system

2016-11-13 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hi, we are about to merge the wip-python-build-system. I'd like to add some commentary there explaining how the different install methods of Python behave. This could save someone else the effort of anaylsing and testing this again is some questions about the Python build system arise. I ask you