Hello,
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>> But then, the problem is that ‘guix pull’ or in fact any ‘guix’ command
>> will give you non-relocatable binaries. So you need to somehow map,
>> say, ~/.local/state/guix/store to /gnu/store for all the user sessions,
>> as seamlessly as possible.
>
> Or change
Hi Ludo, Konrad,
>Wed 02 Apr 2025 at 17:11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Thoughts?
The lower the number of dependencies, the better, within reasonable.
In the ideal case, if a single/group of users connected to a computing
cluster was able to benefit from all guix goodies, without expecting too
m
Hi Konrad,
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> In the long run, I'd rather have "personal Guix". Or maybe call it
> "guik", the little-used singular of "guix" ;-) Meaning Guix running
> entirely in a user's home directory. If you want a sandbox, just create
> a new user account for it. Unlike the Docker wo
Hi Ludo,
> But then, the problem is that ‘guix pull’ or in fact any ‘guix’ command
> will give you non-relocatable binaries. So you need to somehow map,
> say, ~/.local/state/guix/store to /gnu/store for all the user sessions,
> as seamlessly as possible.
Or change the location of the store and
