> I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it?
No, possibly because it doesn't add much when one has iptables and a
guix configuration script for it.
> We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex
> search.
We have iptables and ebtables
and I suggest you consider
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:42:38 +0100
swedebugia wrote:
> I need help.
>
> It fails with
>
> starting phase `install'
> running "python setup.py" with command "install" and parameters
> ("--prefix=/gnu/store/v8kzgqs1jdfg7wzqr9c02719ada6x8bm-ufw-0.35"
> "--single-version-externally-managed"
Hi
On 2018-11-10 19:24, Brett Gilio wrote:
swedebugia writes:
On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote:
Hi
I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it?
If not I'm going to try.
Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm?
We have no other firewall packages judging from my
Well, we have iptables, but ufw would probably not fit there :p
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
swedebugia writes:
> On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it?
>>
>> If not I'm going to try.
>>
> Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm?
>
> We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex search.
On 2018-11-10 17:01, swedebugia wrote:
Hi
I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it?
If not I'm going to try.
Where should it be? In networking.scm or python.scm?
We have no other firewall packages judging from my emacs-guix regex search.
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
Hi
I like this firewall, has anybody started packaging it?
If not I'm going to try.
--
Cheers
Swedebugia
