Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-07-02 Thread ng0
ng0 transcribed 10K bytes: > What happened to this idea? > > Is anyone working on it or should I try to find someone who > wants to work on it? > > It's rather simple from my perspective. Alright. Going by the example I provided earlier this year, could we simply use a variable in there which ge

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-06-08 Thread ng0
What happened to this idea? Is anyone working on it or should I try to find someone who wants to work on it? It's rather simple from my perspective. ng0 transcribed 8.4K bytes: > ng0 writes: > > > Marius Bakke writes: > > > >> Hi Guix, > >> > >> I read somewhere that Debian packages certain F

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > I wrote: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I >>> tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to >>> load extensions from a directory. >>> >>> The attached (outdated!) patch adds the

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-13 Thread ng0
ng0 writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Hi Guix, >> >> I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I >> tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to >> load extensions from a directory. >> >> The attached (outdated!) patch adds the "uBlock" XPI to

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 23:26:24 -0200, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > We are more unhappy because CludFlare makes site visitors (of any site > that uses their service) to use non-free software automatically. Not that this excuses the issue or lessens the need for the liberation of CloudFlare's J

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread Mark H Weaver
I wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I >> tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to >> load extensions from a directory. >> >> The attached (outdated!) patch adds the "uBlock" XPI to >> /lib/icecat/exte

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Marius, Marius Bakke writes: > I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I > tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to > load extensions from a directory. > > The attached (outdated!) patch adds the "uBlock" XPI to > /lib/icecat/extensions.

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
We are more unhappy because CludFlare makes site visitors (of any site that uses their service) to use non-free software automatically. Sorry for self-promoting my actionst, but: There's even an action item about it on LibrePlanet wiki:

Re: Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread ng0
Marius Bakke writes: > Hi Guix, > > I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I > tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to > load extensions from a directory. > > The attached (outdated!) patch adds the "uBlock" XPI to > /lib/icecat/extensions

Packaging IceCat extensions with Guix

2017-01-12 Thread Marius Bakke
Hi Guix, I read somewhere that Debian packages certain Firefox extensions. I tried doing the same with Guix, but haven't been able to get IceCat to load extensions from a directory. The attached (outdated!) patch adds the "uBlock" XPI to /lib/icecat/extensions. I've tried symlinking this to "stan