Yeah, patching that one line in lib/rubygems/packge.rb works well. I'll
clean it up and send in a patch to guix in the morning. Thanks for pointing
me in the right direction.
-r
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 at 21:19 Rob Syme wrote:
> Oh, wait. I think we need the patches from PR#1457 (
> https://github.c
Oh, wait. I think we need the patches from PR#1457 (
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/1457/files). I'll make a patch
and see.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 at 21:11 Rob Syme wrote:
> Ah, good thinking Ben, thanks. I've had a quick look, and the rubygems
> included in ruby version 2.3.1 tarball in
Ah, good thinking Ben, thanks. I've had a quick look, and the rubygems
included in ruby version 2.3.1 tarball includes all of the symlinks fixes
made in PR#1209, so *maybe* we don't need rubygems version 2.5.2 after all.
I'm just testing to see if upgrading the ruby package to 2.3.1 fixes
everythin
Hi Rob,
On 27/04/16 20:39, Rob Syme wrote:
Hi all
Running `guix environment --ad-hoc ruby-ansi` fails for me (and
others). The package definition uses the ruby-build-system but fetches
the tar.gz directly from github instead of from rubygems. I'll try and
find time to have a closer look, but
Hi Rob,
On 27/04/16 20:39, Rob Syme wrote:
Hi all
Running `guix environment --ad-hoc ruby-ansi` fails for me (and
others). The package definition uses the ruby-build-system but fetches
the tar.gz directly from github instead of from rubygems. I'll try and
find time to have a closer look, but
Hi all
Running `guix environment --ad-hoc ruby-ansi` fails for me (and others).
The package definition uses the ruby-build-system but fetches the tar.gz
directly from github instead of from rubygems. I'll try and find time to
have a closer look, but if Ricardo has any time, he might be able to deb
