Gammel Holte skribis:
> I disagree here. I have very functional Arch & Gentoo installs with no
> scripting language other than Perl, which is a dependency of many GNU tools.
>
> In particular I'm doing just fine without Python. Installing everything by
> default is a bit suboptimal from a securit
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:26:02PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> To begin with, we could have a “weechat” package with a “reasonable”
>> option set:
>> (define weechat
>> (make-weechat "weechat"))
>>
>> And possibly another variant with, say, all the options enab
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:26:02PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > To begin with, we could have a “weechat” package with a “reasonable”
> > option set:
> > (define weechat
> > (make-weechat "weechat"))
> >
> > And possibly another var
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:26:02PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> To begin with, we could have a “weechat” package with a “reasonable”
> option set:
> (define weechat
> (make-weechat "weechat"))
>
> And possibly another variant with, say, all the options enabled:
> (define weechat-full
>
宋文武 skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Gammel Holte skribis:
>>
>>> For example, consider samtools, a package I use daily and that was recently
>>> committed to Guix:
>>>
>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm#n139
>>>
>>> It forces me to install
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Gammel Holte skribis:
>>
>>> For example, consider samtools, a package I use daily and that was recently
>>> committed to Guix:
>>>
>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm#n139
>>>
>>> It forces me
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Gammel Holte skribis:
>
>> For example, consider samtools, a package I use daily and that was recently
>> committed to Guix:
>>
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm#n139
>>
>> It forces me to install python. In contrast, cons
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Gammel Holte skribis:
>
>> For example, consider samtools, a package I use daily and that was recently
>> committed to Guix:
>>
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm#n139
>>
>> It forces me to install python. In contrast, cons
Gammel Holte skribis:
> For example, consider samtools, a package I use daily and that was recently
> committed to Guix:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm#n139
>
> It forces me to install python. In contrast, consider Arch AUR's package:
>
> https:
Apologies for the really late reply. Sadly I was ill for the best part of
December.
So I wouldn’t claim this is a solved problem, because it really gets
> fixed when we discover a problematic case, and we certainly overlook
> some of them. Yet, that’s something I pay attention to, and I think we
Hello,
Gammel Holte skribis:
> Nix doesn't have a good decoupling between packages and their optional
> runtime dependencies. You can disable them, but this would lead to a
> different package hash, and thus a different build (negating the use of
> prebuilt binaries).
>
> Therefore, the culture
Hello,
I'm glad to see all interesting ideas from Nix being implemented as a DSL
on top of Scheme, which makes an awesome combination.
That said, I would like to bring up an issue I've faced multiple times
while using Nix, hoping that Guix can adopt a better solution here:
optional runtime depend
12 matches
Mail list logo
