zimoun writes:
> If I understand well, the policy is: the packages in the file cran.scm
> cannot import '(gnu packages bioconductor).
Yes. It’s not official policy, but I think we should avoid mutually
recursive module imports when we have a choice.
> In the file cran.scm, for example the pa
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 09:41, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > ;; This is a CRAN package, but it uncharacteristically depends on a
> > ;; Bioconductor package
> > --8<---cut here---end--->8---
zimoun writes:
> 1.
> Currently, the file bioconductor.scm contains 4 packages with
> 'cran-uri' and git blames you. :-)
>
> Well, the 4 commits are:
>
> : a207bca2ad gnu: r-codedepends: Move from cran to bioconductor.
> : 3a0babacdc gnu: Add r-htscluster.
> : 7ed869f796 gnu: Add r-nbpseq.
> :
Hi Ricarco
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> PS: I also think that CRAN things in bioinformatics.scm should be moved
> to cran.scm, and even some or all of the R stuff in statistics.scm.
> (Same applies to Bioconductor packages, which should end up in
> bioconductor.scm wher
Hi Ricardo,
Thank you for your inputs.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > The packages r-desolve, r-quadprog, r-subplex and r-pracma are defined
> > in `maths.scm`. They come from the CRAN archive. For consistency, they
> > should be defined in the file `cran.scm`. Do you a
Hi simon,
> The packages r-desolve, r-quadprog, r-subplex and r-pracma are defined
> in `maths.scm`. They come from the CRAN archive. For consistency, they
> should be defined in the file `cran.scm`. Do you agree to move them?
I think moving them to cran.scm is fine. In my opinion both of thes
zimoun writes:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 16:37, zimoun wrote:
>
>> The packages r-desolve, r-quadprog, r-subplex and r-pracma are defined
>> in `maths.scm`. They come from the CRAN archive. For consistency, they
>> should be defined in the file `cran.scm`. Do you agree to move them?
>
> What ha
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 16:37, zimoun wrote:
> The packages r-desolve, r-quadprog, r-subplex and r-pracma are defined
> in `maths.scm`. They come from the CRAN archive. For consistency, they
> should be defined in the file `cran.scm`. Do you agree to move them?
What happens to the Copyright?
Dear,
The packages r-desolve, r-quadprog, r-subplex and r-pracma are defined
in `maths.scm`. They come from the CRAN archive. For consistency, they
should be defined in the file `cran.scm`. Do you agree to move them?
All the best,
simon
