Hi Mark,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> Linux-libre-4.1.x has reached end-of-life, so it will no longer receive
>> security updates from upstream. Any objections to removing it?
>
> No objections from me.
Also none from me. Please remove it. Thank you!
--
Ricardo
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Linux-libre-4.1.x has reached end-of-life, so it will no longer receive
> security updates from upstream. Any objections to removing it?
No objections from me.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Linux-libre-4.1.x has reached end-of-life, so it will no longer receive
security updates from upstream. Any objections to removing it?
Mark
Mark H Weaver writes:
> linux-4.1.42 has just been released, which includes a backport of the
> Stack Clash mitigation. Hopefully the corresponding linux-libre release
> will be out in the next day or so.
I just pushed the update to linux-libre-4.1.42.
Mark
lar to commit 91c623aae0f10992aa46957b9072679534e4cd28,
but applied only to linux-libre-4.1.
Mark
Users of linux-libre@4.1 should take notice:
I've been unable to find backported patches for CVE-2017-1000364 (Stack
Clash mitigation) for linux-4.1. Also, upstream support for that kernel
version will reach end-of-life in about a month, so you should plan to
migrate to another kernel ve
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
>> to remove it.
>
> Is this not the only version of Linux libre that does not expose the
> system clock bug Libreboot users suffer fro
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
> to remove it.
Is this not the only version of Linux libre that does not expose the
system clock bug Libreboot users suffer from?
I’m still using 4.1 on one of my machines for that rea
pdates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified in
>> > their GuixSD configuration.
>>
>> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
>> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
>
> Ah, right. I w
#x27;ve specified in
> > their GuixSD configuration.
>
> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
Ah, right. I was thinking of `guix package -u .` for out-of-tree packages.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, because if we removed it, any
attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
Mark
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
> to remove it.
>
> Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months
> between the last two releases), and the recent update to 4.1.40
> neglected to inc
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:11:39AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
>> to remove it.
>>
>> Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months
>&g
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:11:39AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
> to remove it.
>
> Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months
> between the last two releases), and the rec
Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like
to remove it.
Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months
between the last two releases), and the recent update to 4.1.40
neglected to include a fix for CVE-2017-6074, which does not in
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
>
> > * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-4.1, linux-libre-4.4,
> > linux-libre-4.9): Add patch for CVE-2017-6074.
>
> If you haven’t done already, please push! Especially since
Leo Famulari skribis:
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-4.1, linux-libre-4.4,
> linux-libre-4.9): Add patch for CVE-2017-6074.
If you haven’t done already, please push! Especially since this
vulnerability is ranked as “high”.
Thank you!
Ludo’.
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre-4.1, linux-libre-4.4,
linux-libre-4.9): Add patch for CVE-2017-6074.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 36 +---
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index
"Jason Self" writes:
> Hello, just wanted to let you know I've made up some kernel
> configuration files for 4.1. Just in case you want to use them.
>
> https://jxself.org/git/?p=kernel-configs.git
Already done:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=f3457e7001c44b4455d80c6d44ec92a
Hello, just wanted to let you know I've made up some kernel
configuration files for 4.1. Just in case you want to use them.
https://jxself.org/git/?p=kernel-configs.git
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
