Re: Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Federico Beffa skribis: > From my point of view it would be good to include en_US.UTF-8 by > default for two reasons: (i) we already are at 7 (4+3) packages > requiring an UTF-8 locale and, I guess, that this number is doomed to > increase in the following years. (ii) This is another small step i

Re: Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
John Darrington skribis: > The C locale is the canonical locale. UTF-8 is not the only characater > encoding in > the world. English is not the only language in the world, and US English is > not > the only dialect of English. You’re right, of course. For the packages discussed, what matters

Re: Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread Federico Beffa
John Darrington writes: > (i) we already are at 7 (4+3) packages requiring an UTF-8 locale > > Then that is a bug which should be filed against those pacakges. I just discovered the problem with the "scipy ecosystem" packages today and intended to fix them. But, before submitting changes, I w

Re: Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread John Darrington
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:36:58PM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Federico Beffa skribis: > >> Guile-ncurses was fixed by adding a new phase to generate the >> "en_US.UTF-8" locale during the generation of the packag

Re: Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread Federico Beffa
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Federico Beffa skribis: > >> Guile-ncurses was fixed by adding a new phase to generate the >> "en_US.UTF-8" locale during the generation of the package, but wouldn't >> it be better to keep the "en_US.UTF-8" locale? That appears to be the

Lack of locales in build environment

2015-02-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Federico Beffa skribis: > Guile-ncurses was fixed by adding a new phase to generate the > "en_US.UTF-8" locale during the generation of the package, but wouldn't > it be better to keep the "en_US.UTF-8" locale? That appears to be the > default used by most packages. That’s an open question. The