Hi!
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Also how far did we go with LVM support?
This was discussed looong ago (whether/how the device-mapping code would
be a good fit for LVM) but we don’t have any code.
This would be nice to have, though I wouldn’t consider it a blocker for
1.0.
Ludo’.
Hi,
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> I have seen an earlier attempt to add lvm support to guixsd.
> I would like to know the status of lvm support, and willing to assist with it.
I think your best bet is to review past email threads on this topic.
Search the archives for "lvm" and sim
I have seen an earlier attempt to add lvm support to guixsd.
I would like to know the status of lvm support, and willing to assist with
it.
Tomáš Čech skribis:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 09:59:53PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>>Could you send an updated patch? It sounds like we’re almost there,
>>I guess.
>
> Not there yet. Now I need to make some changes with mounting order to help
> non-root filesystems on LVM volume.
>
>
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 09:59:53PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
Sorry for all the delays :)
Tomáš Čech skribis:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:52:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
So I would declare
(mapped-device
(source "/dev/sda")
(target "volume_gr
Sorry for the delay.
Tomáš Čech skribis:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:52:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>>So I would declare
>>
>> (mapped-device
>>(source "/dev/sda")
>>(target "volume_group_name-logical_volume_name")
>>(kind lvm-device-mapping))
>>
>>and that would giv
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 05:52:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech skribis:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech skribis:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
Sorry I’m not really familiar with LVM.
It'
Tomáš Čech skribis:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>Tomáš Čech skribis:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
Sorry I’m not really familiar with LVM.
>>>
>>> It's implemented using device mapper but instead
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech skribis:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
Sorry I’m not really familiar with LVM.
It's implemented using device mapper but instead of mapping one block
device to another you
Tomáš Čech skribis:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>>Sorry I’m not really familiar with LVM.
>
> It's implemented using device mapper but instead of mapping one block
> device to another you map one block device to whole group (like
> playground where y
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech skribis:
as project for my Hackweek in SUSE I decided to spend my time on LVM
support in GuixSD - something I miss greatly. This also means that
I'll have much less time for that after this week :(
Well this is
Tomáš Čech skribis:
> as project for my Hackweek in SUSE I decided to spend my time on LVM
> support in GuixSD - something I miss greatly. This also means that
> I'll have much less time for that after this week :(
Well this is nice already!
> So far I spent time on r
Hi Guix,
as project for my Hackweek in SUSE I decided to spend my time on LVM
support in GuixSD - something I miss greatly. This also means that
I'll have much less time for that after this week :(
So far I spent time on reviving my GuixSD installation and preparing
staticly linked binarie
13 matches
Mail list logo