>When Julia language was first discussed here, I suggested to write an
>Octave -> Julia translator, but I think it will NEVER be done for
>ideological (fanatic support of false/fake GPL freedom) reasons.
Sergei,
you had stopped for a while insulting the Octave developers and the free
software com
Hi, Sergei. Haven't spoken in a while.
On Sun, 2016-08-14 at 08:07 +, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> When Julia language was first discussed here, I suggested to write
> an Octave -> Julia translator, but I think it will NEVER be done for
> ideological (fanatic support of false/fake GPL freedom) r
- Original Message -
> From: Alex Vong
> To: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
> Cc: Ricardo Wurmus ; guix-devel@gnu.org; Leo Famulari
> ; help-oct...@gnu.org; Mike Miller
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: JIT compiling
>
> Jordi Gutiérrez He
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 23:27 +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
>> Finally, some unrelated stuff, I hope octave would have a byte code
>> interpreter soon. I would suggest to write it in rpython, it seems
>> to be the easiest way to have jit these days.
>
> That is a faraway
; Mike Miller
>>
>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 7:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: JIT compiling
>>
>> On 12.08.2016 17:08, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>>>>
On 12.08.2016 17:08, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
>> To: Alex Vong
>> Cc: Ricardo Wurmus ; guix-devel@gnu.org; Leo Famulari
>> ; help-oct...@gnu.org; Mike Miller
>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 20
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 23:27 +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
> Finally, some unrelated stuff, I hope octave would have a byte code
> interpreter soon. I would suggest to write it in rpython, it seems
> to be the easiest way to have jit these days.
That is a faraway pipe dream. Can you help?
- Jordi G. H.
