On Tue, Feb 06 2024, Dale Mellor wrote:
>Agree that it would have repercussions throughout the package
> ecosystem. I would have thought that it would make things easier. You
> could argue that you don't benefit from the Guile syntax checker, but
> at the end of the day you don't find out you
Hello Carlo,
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 23:10 +1100, Carlo Zancanaro wrote:
> The nginx{,-upstream,-server}-configuration records have fields for
> {extra,raw}-content, which do allow arbitrary configuration lines to
> be
> added to their config. I think this is a sensible escape hatch to
> have
> to p
Hi Dale!
On Tue, Feb 06 2024, Dale Mellor wrote:
>There is no middle ground.
The nginx{,-upstream,-server}-configuration records have fields for
{extra,raw}-content, which do allow arbitrary configuration lines to be
added to their config. I think this is a sensible escape hatch to have
to pr
Hello,
I am in the process of moving my production machine
to a pure Guix setup, and feeling some pain which I
feel is somewhat unnecessary.
There are two extremes supported by the Guix system
in configuring services: either a native application
configuration file is given and used verbatim
