Hi Ludovic + Ricardo!
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> We could probably arrange so that ‘gexp->sexp’ reports about objects
>> without a read syntax that remain in the resulting sexp.
>
> This is a good idea. It’s never the right thing for unreadable syntax
> to appear in a generated S-expression when
Hi Ludo,
> Hi,
>
> zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis:
>
>> I saw this specific error message a few times while I was building 'guix
>> deploy'. It means something's been printed that can't be read, which
>> (might) be the case if something doesn't have a G-Expression com
Hi,
zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) skribis:
> I saw this specific error message a few times while I was building 'guix
> deploy'. It means something's been printed that can't be read, which
> (might) be the case if something doesn't have a G-Expression compiler.
> My money is
Hi Ricardo and Alex,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> This error, in general shape, looks very much like an error I kept getting
>> when first "deploying" to a guix server. I found that doing a pull on the
>> server, followed by a system reconfigure then allowed me to actually
>> successfully run deplo
Hi Alex,
> This error, in general shape, looks very much like an error I kept getting
> when first "deploying" to a guix server. I found that doing a pull on the
> server, followed by a system reconfigure then allowed me to actually
> successfully run deploy afterwards.
>
> I'm not sure what cau
Hi Ricardo, as no one has responded yet, I'd figure I'd share my 2¢.
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, 16:23 Ricardo Wurmus, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m using this deployment file:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (use-modules (sysadmin build-machines)
> (sysadm
Hi,
I’m using this deployment file:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(use-modules (sysadmin build-machines)
(sysadmin people))
(define %ids (list 25))
(define (system-for id)
(berlin-build-machine-os id))
(define (id->ip id)
(format #f "141.80.16
