Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> OK for the attached patch?
>>>
>>>
>>> From b7564a7f68fe2d2d74d0d1bc768eb19dbab09a36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Alex Kost
>>> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:27:56 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] license
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> OK for the attached patch?
>>
>>
>> From b7564a7f68fe2d2d74d0d1bc768eb19dbab09a36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost
>> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:27:56 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] licenses: Add 'imlib2'.
>>
>> * guix/license
Alex Kost skribis:
> OK for the attached patch?
>
>
> From b7564a7f68fe2d2d74d0d1bc768eb19dbab09a36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:27:56 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] licenses: Add 'imlib2'.
>
> * guix/licenses.scm (imlib2): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/image
Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-26 01:16 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> I've noticed that there is “imlib2” license:
>>
>> - http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#imlib
>> - http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Imlib2
>>
>> Is it worth to
Alex Kost skribis:
> I've noticed that there is “imlib2” license:
>
> - http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#imlib
> - http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Imlib2
>
> Is it worth to add it to (guix licenses) module and to use it for
> “imlib2” package?
Yes, sure.
Ludo’.
I've noticed that there is “imlib2” license:
- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#imlib
- http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Imlib2
Is it worth to add it to (guix licenses) module and to use it for
“imlib2” package?
--
Alex