Thanks Marius,
I’m feeling quite out of my depth here so thanks for the background. It seems
like maintaining a fork effectively might be a lot more work. Is there really
no other good way to accomplish a custom build?
John
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 11:44 AM, Marius Bakke wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
Thanks Tim!
Good to know! Thank you. Looking again at the call to runhaskell in the
configure phase, then. It does accept --package-db as an argument. Is it
feasible to parse GHC_PACKAGE_PATH into the correct package paths instead of
using the environment variable?
Thanks!
John
> On Feb 12,
Hello!
Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi John,
>
> John Soo writes:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I did a little digging this morning and it seems like runhaskell is
>> probably deprecated in favor of runghc. Do we expect anyone to be
>> using hugs or jhc? Runghc also supports ghc flags. I still need to do
>
Hi John,
John Soo writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I did a little digging this morning and it seems like runhaskell is
> probably deprecated in favor of runghc. Do we expect anyone to be
> using hugs or jhc? Runghc also supports ghc flags. I still need to do
> some more research here but the Haskell con
Hi John,
John Soo writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I did a little digging this morning and it seems like runhaskell is
> probably deprecated in favor of runghc. Do we expect anyone to be
> using hugs or jhc? Runghc also supports ghc flags. I still need to do
> some more research here but the Haskell con
Hi there,
I did a little digging this morning and it seems like runhaskell is probably
deprecated in favor of runghc. Do we expect anyone to be using hugs or jhc?
Runghc also supports ghc flags. I still need to do some more research here but
the Haskell configure phase deliberately unsets GHC_
Hi John,
John Soo writes:
> I’ll check out git-annex as a start. Custom Cabal builds would be a
> nice feature to add to the haskell-build-system. Would it be
> sufficient to add some extra argument to the build system?
At this point, I don’t know what the argument would do. :)
The solution I
Thanks Tim,
I’ll check out git-annex as a start. Custom Cabal builds would be a nice
feature to add to the haskell-build-system. Would it be sufficient to add some
extra argument to the build system?
Best,
John
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 12:19 PM, Timothy Sample wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> John Soo
Hi John,
John Soo writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I’ve been working on some Haskell packages and got stuck recently and I
> didn’t know why until I realized the cabal files have `build-type: Custom`
> (http://hackage.haskell.org/package/termonad-1.1.0.0/termonad.cabal). I
> always get missing dependenc
Hi Guix,
I’ve been working on some Haskell packages and got stuck recently and I didn’t
know why until I realized the cabal files have `build-type: Custom`
(http://hackage.haskell.org/package/termonad-1.1.0.0/termonad.cabal). I always
get missing dependencies even though I have the dependencies
10 matches
Mail list logo
