On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:56:53 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> FYI your editor is using dos style /n/r newlines. Don't know if that
> is your intention. Are you on windows? O.O xD
Thanks for the heads-up!
No, it's nano on GuixSD. (Guile emacs on Guix broke a long time ago and while
there was a worka
FYI your editor is using dos style /n/r newlines. Don't know if that
is your intention. Are you on windows? O.O xD
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:20 PM, David Craven wrote:
>> Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use on its own - at least that's
>> the intention with the whole make-u-boot-pack
> Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use on its own - at least that's
> the intention with the whole make-u-boot-package thing.
Did you see the updated u-boot patch? It includes support for
cross-compilation, so make-u-boot-package takes a xgcc package and a
target triplet as arguments.
If I forgot any other things, see my working copy
http://www.scratchpost.org/software/Guix/guix.tar.gz - warning: there be
dragons.
The existing files that I touched for U-Boot are:
./gnu/build/vm.scm ; initialize-hard-disk has a key #:grub.cfg
./gnu/build/install.scm ; actual invocation of gru
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:52:23 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> > > (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
> > >(board "vexpress_ca9x4")
> > >(device "/dev/sdX")
> > >(u-boot armhf-linux-uboot)))
>
> Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use
> > (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
> >(board "vexpress_ca9x4")
> >(device "/dev/sdX")
> >(u-boot armhf-linux-uboot)))
Note: It should infer the correct u-boot to use on its own - at least that's
the intention with the whole make-u-boot-packag
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:51:45 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> So I think that dtc and uboot are good now, I'll give it a few days
> before merging...
>
> I'm getting an Unbound variable: error :/
>
> Here's my bootloader configuration. Any suggestions? =)
>
> (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
>
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:51:45 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> So I think that dtc and uboot are good now, I'll give it a few days
> before merging...
>
> I'm getting an Unbound variable: error :/
>
> Here's my bootloader configuration. Any suggestions? =)
>
> (bootloader (u-boot-configuration
>
So I think that dtc and uboot are good now, I'll give it a few days
before merging...
I'm getting an Unbound variable: error :/
Here's my bootloader configuration. Any suggestions? =)
(bootloader (u-boot-configuration
(board "vexpress_ca9x4")
(device "/dev/sdX")
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:12:00 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> Mhmm so I'm trying your patches and I get a no code for gnu system
> u-boot. The file seems to be missing from the patches?
Attached gnu/system/u-boot.scm . (Don't worry, once the branch is up, I'll diff
with what I have here :) )
;;; GNU
Mhmm so I'm trying your patches and I get a no code for gnu system
u-boot. The file seems to be missing from the patches?
> If merging is deemed too risky, would it be possible to create a
> "wip-u-boot" branch on Savannah instead? - it seems that is
> how these bigger changes are handled. Then I could push the
> U-Boot parts there.
I'll collect your patches and do that. That should make it easier
to test. (I'm not q
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:28:31 +0200
David Craven wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I pushed the packages.
>
> Is there a git repo somewhere I can pull your uboot stuff from? I'd
> like to test it =)
There's no such repo right now.
I'd prefer merging into master soon to creating a fork
13 matches
Mail list logo