Hi,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 18:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Using the Software Heritage (SWH) API [3], does it seems a good idea
> >> to add SWH coverage somewhere in the Guix Data Services?
>
> That’s a great idea! Maybe it’s not a good idea to store that info in
> the database of the Data S
Hi,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> zimoun writes:
[...]
>> Using the Software Heritage (SWH) API [3], does it seems a good idea
>> to add SWH coverage somewhere in the Guix Data Services?
That’s a great idea! Maybe it’s not a good idea to store that info in
the database of the Data Service t
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 10:00, Christopher Baines wrote:
> I think the first step towards this would be to experiment with fetching
> data from the Software Heritage API. Do you know how you'd fetch data
> about the output from a fixed output derivation (like harfbuzz)?
>
> http://data.
zimoun writes:
> Recently, the source of package was missing and so "guix time-machine"
> was broken [1]. It is not the first time that it appears [2]; patches
> are coming... :-)
>
> Using the Software Heritage (SWH) API [3], does it seems a good idea
> to add SWH coverage somewhere in the Guix
Hi,
Recently, the source of package was missing and so "guix time-machine"
was broken [1]. It is not the first time that it appears [2]; patches
are coming... :-)
Using the Software Heritage (SWH) API [3], does it seems a good idea
to add SWH coverage somewhere in the Guix Data Services?
I do no
