Simon Josefsson writes:
>> Could you check if that works better? (You can probably just start with
>> ‘guix time-machine -q --commit=143faecec3c81e4c7325430a6e759b1619eb406f …’).
>
> With
>
> jas@kaka:~/src/shepherd$ git log -1
> commit f7fa03a74be697c0926c62e9297e9f78d58ff469 (HEAD, tag: v1.0.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> I tried to simplify things by using 'guix shell' like this (using Guix
>> commit a36ff7d51110403295a359e7f40c3eb42ccfd509):
>
> FWIW, I used ‘guix shell -CPDf guix.scm texlive-scheme-basic’ from this:
...
> Could you check if that works better? (You can probably just s
Hi Simon,
> I cannot reproduce your tarball, and one reason is that I don't know
> what recipe you used and what tool versions you were using. Is there
> documentation on how to reproduce the release tarball anywhere? Could
> the tool version information be included in the release announcement?
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> It is bit-for-bit reproducible from a checkout of the ‘v1.0.4’ tag of
> the Git repository.
Yay, thanks for supporting repreproducible tarballs!
I cannot reproduce your tarball, and one reason is that I don't know
what recipe you used and what tool versions you wer
We are glad to announce version 1.0.4 of the Shepherd, the next
bug-fix release in the 1.0.x series.
Check out the web site to learn more about the Shepherd 1.0.x series:
https://gnu.org/software/shepherd/news/2024/12/the-shepherd-1.0.0-released/
• About
The Shepherd is a service manager wr
