Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> It’s been discussed several times, but there’s no satisfactory solution
>> so far. Changing the name seems like a bad idea, because it’s really
>> gcc. Making either gcc-final or gcc-4.8 private isn’t an
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:00:57PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It’s been discussed several times, but there’s no satisfactory solution
> so far. Changing the name seems like a bad idea, because it’s really
> gcc. Making either gcc-final or gcc-4.8 private isn’t an option because
> they’re ref
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> > Also, maybe we could drop one of the three gcc versions.
>> The default package does C and C++. We could imagine another one that
>> would in addition to Objective-C and FORTRAN, yes. That woul
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> That would be too big. Plus, when you say “all”, do you really mean Ada
> and Java for instance? These make things definitely bigger.
Okay.
> > Also, maybe we could drop one of the three gcc versions.
> The default package does
Andreas Enge skribis:
> gcc-objc++-4.8.2.mips64el-linux fails to be built because of:
>
> building of
> `/gnu/store/avdn8phqm44v33p6k42pipybcgjs92mb-gcc-objc++-4.8.2.drv' timed out
> after 72000 seconds
> @ build-failed
> /gnu/store/avdn8phqm44v33p6k42pipybcgjs92mb-gcc-objc++-4.8.2.drv - timeo
