Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-15 17:28 +0300) wrote:
> "Cook, Malcolm" skribis:
>
>> Hi - I'm late to this discussion - not sure all the issues on the table -
>> but how about deferring to markdown in such cases.
>
> We could use a more advanced format. In that case I would prefer sexps
> (but they
"Cook, Malcolm" skribis:
> Hi - I'm late to this discussion - not sure all the issues on the table - but
> how about deferring to markdown in such cases.
We could use a more advanced format. In that case I would prefer sexps
(but they would not play well with i18n), or, if we use a text DSL,
O
> Yes, why not; it’s still not very pleasant to the eye but at least it
> formatting
> will be preserved (except for guix-web, but we can fix it
> later.)
>
> > And as I have an unhealthy desire to organize the same things in the
> > same manner, what variant to choose for formatting lists? Shou
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-13 20:06 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>> Formatting will be lost in UIs, so this should be a comma-separated list
>> instead.
>
> Currently the formatting is not lost in Emacs UI, but I agree on this one.
The --show and --search options fill paragraphs, and
Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-13 20:06 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> And one more thing: there are "windowswmproto" and "libwindowswm"
>> packages that have something to do with MS Windows and Cygwin. Do we
>> need them?
>
> If that’s really what they are, let’s remove them.
OK, I'll s
