Hi Jack and Marius,
glad to hear that GUIX saying "no" to 2.2.7 in general was a
misunderstanding on my side. Thanks for the clarification!
Best
Sebastian
Sebastian,
Thank you very much for reaching out downstream!
Sebastian Pipping writes:
> Hi Jack,
>
>
> On 12.07.19 01:17, Jack Hill wrote:
>> I'm pleased to let you know that we've applied the fix for
>> CVE-2018-20843 in GNU Guix as of
>> 5a836ce38c9c29e9c2bd306007347486b90c5064 [0]. We electe
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 12.07.19 01:17, Jack Hill wrote:
We elected to backport the patch that fixed the problem instead of
upgrading due to a change in the expat abi with 2.2.7 [1].
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/36424#2
thanks for the update
Hi Jack,
On 12.07.19 01:17, Jack Hill wrote:
> I'm pleased to let you know that we've applied the fix for
> CVE-2018-20843 in GNU Guix as of
> 5a836ce38c9c29e9c2bd306007347486b90c5064 [0]. We elected to backport the
> patch that fixed the problem instead of upgrading due to a change in the
> expa
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello everyone!
Sorry for the noise if you heard about the release of 2.2.7 about a week
ago through some other channel and maybe even took action, already!
To be quick, there is one DoS fix — for CVE-2018-20843 [1] — and misc
build system fixes.
Hello everyone!
Sorry for the noise if you heard about the release of 2.2.7 about a week
ago through some other channel and maybe even took action, already!
To be quick, there is one DoS fix — for CVE-2018-20843 [1] — and misc
build system fixes. The change log with details is up at [2].
If yo
