Re: Enabling contribution through documentation

2023-11-10 Thread Matt
On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 23:43:07 +0100 Samuel Christie wrote --- > > Hello Matt; sorry, I've been distracted and almost missed your reply a few > weeks ago. Not a problem! I've been distracted, too. :) > Any thoughts on process? Maybe we could have a repo managed the same way > Guix is

Re: Enabling contribution through documentation

2023-11-06 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hello Matt; sorry, I've been distracted and almost missed your reply a few weeks ago. Matt writes: [...] I tried to write a tutorial on packaging GNU Hello. Really, if I were to look over the shoulder of someone packaging GNU Hello, what would it look like? Why are they doing what they'r

Re: Enabling contribution through documentation

2023-10-16 Thread Matt
One elephant was already spoken about. Your message points toward another: the Guile documentation. The Guile documentation needs significant editing. This is a problem because Guix is forever bound to Guile. For every benefit Guix gains from Guile, it also suffers by inheriting its shortcomi

Re: Enabling contribution through documentation

2023-09-26 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Ekaitz Zarraga writes: An option is to make some kind of user-story based documentation might help? As a long-time wannabe-contributor who has been intimidated by the unfamiliar process, I agree with this statement. In fact, (to acknowledge the other more controversial branch of this co