On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 23:43:07 +0100 Samuel Christie wrote ---
>
> Hello Matt; sorry, I've been distracted and almost missed your reply a few
> weeks ago.
Not a problem! I've been distracted, too. :)
> Any thoughts on process? Maybe we could have a repo managed the same way
> Guix is
Hello Matt; sorry, I've been distracted and almost missed your
reply a few weeks ago.
Matt writes:
[...] I tried to write a tutorial on packaging GNU Hello.
Really, if I were to look over the shoulder of someone packaging
GNU Hello, what would it look like? Why are they doing what
they'r
One elephant was already spoken about. Your message points toward another: the
Guile documentation. The Guile documentation needs significant editing.
This is a problem because Guix is forever bound to Guile. For every benefit
Guix gains from Guile, it also suffers by inheriting its shortcomi
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
An option is to make some kind of user-story based documentation
might help?
As a long-time wannabe-contributor who has been intimidated by the
unfamiliar process, I agree with this statement.
In fact, (to acknowledge the other more controversial branch of
this co