Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I've merged your last 3 patches, thank you so much for your continuous
> contribution to the best Common Lisp package manager ;)
Thanks!
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Great! :)
> Can you send a patch for all this? I'll merge as soon as I can.
I sent the patches (bug#37791).
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Cool! Thanks for working on this! :)
>
> Does it work for dexador?
I just tried compiling ecl-dexador, and it failed. However I think it
fails for a different reason.
The error is:
--8<---cut here---start-&g
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Maybe an easier fix: replace "sbcl" with (%lisp-type). Should work.
Indeed, with the following changes, building ecl-dexador works.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/pack
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Cool! Thanks for working on this! :)
>
> Does it work for dexador?
I just tried compiling ecl-dexador, and it failed. However I think it
fails for a different reason.
The error is:
--8<---cut here---start-&g
Guillaume Le Vaillant writes:
> I just tried compiling ecl-dexador, and it failed. However I think it
> fails for a different reason.
>
> The error is:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> An error occurred during initialization:
Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis:
> However, when I try to compile 'ecl-simple-parallel-tasks', guix first
> tries to build a different derivation of 'ecl-chanl', which fails
> because it apparently doesn't have the modified phases declared in the
> definiti
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:59:01PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>> I've encountered the same problem a couple of times.
>> If you try to compile ecl-dexador, you'll see it fails because it does
>> not re-use the arguments of sbcl-dexa
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 01:59:01PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I've encountered the same problem a couple of times.
> If you try to compile ecl-dexador, you'll see it fails because it does
> not re-use the arguments of sbcl-dexador which patches out a failing
> test.
&
I've encountered the same problem a couple of times.
If you try to compile ecl-dexador, you'll see it fails because it does
not re-use the arguments of sbcl-dexador which patches out a failing
test.
Something is wrong in sbcl-package->ecl-package.
Andy?
That said, it's not a ve
Hi,
I'm trying to package a Common Lisp library and I have a strange
problem.
In 'gnu/packages/lisp.scm', there are packages called 'sbcl-chanl' and
'ecl-chanl' whose definitions are:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl)[source]: Add snippet.
[native-search-paths]: Add XDG_DATA_DIRS.
---
gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 1311a7d..59086e6 100644
--- a/gnu/packages
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:25:10PM -0400, Andy Patterson wrote:
> This patch should address the issue. It's for core-updates. I've tested
> it locally.
Just pushed, thanks a lot!
Andreas
e tested
it locally.
Andy>From 3306dfad4dbb2288a6a689596e3a14abac5a093b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Patterson
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:21:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ecl: Use "kernel-headers" instead of "linux-headers" to
designate input.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm
Yet another package which fails on all architectures:
http://hydra.gnu.org:3000/build/1313690
If someone is interested in it, please have a look.
Andreas
Andy Patterson skribis:
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl)[arguments]: Wrap with PATH, CPATH,
> LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[...]
> + ("libffi" ,libffi)
> + ("linux-headers" ,linux-libre-headers)
> + ("gcc"
Andy Patterson skribis:
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): Enable tests.
That’s good news. Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
Andy Patterson skribis:
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): Update to 16.1.2.
Applied, thanks!
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): Enable tests.
---
gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 33 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index faac8bd..1c7a791 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl)[arguments]: Wrap with PATH, CPATH,
LIBRARY_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH
---
gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 33 +++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 1c7a791..8769410
Hello,
This patch set was created for the purpose of getting ecl to be able to
compile and run a system from within a '--pure' environment. I updated it to
the most recent release and enabled the test suite while I was at it.
Comments welcome.
Thanks,
--
Andy
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): Update to 16.1.2.
---
gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index 863ee00..faac8bd 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -102,15
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> Here's an updated patch for my proposal in my last e-mail.
> [...]
I went ahead and pushed a slightly edited version of that.
Taylan
Here's an updated patch for my proposal in my last e-mail.
>From 1ecd96ab33df9809786f01730a6bf531e56c6dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 22:28:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ecl: Update to version 15.2.21
project will
be moving to Gitorious soon:
http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/news/2015/02/ecl-15221-released-new-maintainer-found/
That being said, your following inquiry tempted me to run the build
process again to get the exact output, and I faced what I describe in
the second additional message in th
project will
be moving to Gitorious soon:
http://sourceforge.net/p/ecls/news/2015/02/ecl-15221-released-new-maintainer-found/
That being said, your following inquiry tempted me to run the build
process again to get the exact output, and I faced what I describe in
the second additional message in th
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> From 33e2fa3853b067ff46513b58a485fef53c1f406b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
>
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 22:28:45 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gn
>From 33e2fa3853b067ff46513b58a485fef53c1f406b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 22:28:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ecl: Update to version 15.2.21.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): Update to version 15.2.21, and disa
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Congratulations, indeed. :-)
>
> The intent for the ‘license’ field is mostly to describe the license of
> the combined work (although apparently the intent was not crystal
> clear.)
>
> In this case, I believe lgpl2.0+ “wins” over the other, more permissi
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> It would be neat to have a page sequentially listing all the licenses we
> support, with some short notice on each highlighting its distinguishing
> features. I had to visit all the separate FSF wiki pages linked from
> guix/lice
xhaust those files and directories, except for
> +;; the contrib/unicode/ directory whose .lisp files have no copyright or
> +;; license notice.
> +(license
> + (list
> + license:lgpl2.0+ ;contrib/: encodings, bytecomp,
> +
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
> > Yowza! I appreciate you being so thorough, but this may be a bit over
> > the top :) I'd like to hear what Ludovic thinks before okaying a push.
I think there is no problem in pushing the p
but I'm fond of the
> style above either. Although there is no mutation, it is essentially
> written in an imperative style.
>
> How about something like this instead?
>
> '(#:phases
>;; The test-suite seems to assume that ECL is installed. So re-orde
C4=B1/Kammer?=
>
> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:15:02 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ECL.
>
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (ecl): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 74
> ---
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 3 deleti
a better way to keep some sanity amid the license jungle.
>From 8852980acdfbcec00cb794fa924e03a95d60d59f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:15:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ECL.
* gnu/packages/lisp.scm (
35 matches
Mail list logo
