Hi,
宋文武 writes:
> Hello, we have a TODO for "extend `propagated-inputs` with support for
> multiple outputs". I try to do it for a while, but unable to find a
> clear way, since add a new syntax for specify output in
> propagated-inputs require changes in too many places..
>
> Think about the i
Hello, we have a TODO for "extend `propagated-inputs` with support for
multiple outputs". I try to do it for a while, but unable to find a
clear way, since add a new syntax for specify output in
propagated-inputs require changes in too many places..
Think about the intention, what we want is to a
Hello, we have a TODO for "extend `propagated-inputs` with support for
multiple outputs". I try to do it for a while, but unable to find a
clear way, since add a new syntax for specify output in
propagated-inputs require changes in too many places..
Think about the intention, what we want is to a
