Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus 写道：
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
>>> The Guix manual says:
Guix is compatible with Nix, so it is possible to share […]
>>>
>>> Unless somebody objects, I'd like to (wait for it) nix this from
>>> the
>>> manual entirely.
>>
>> I don’t objec
Ricardo Wurmus 写道：
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
The Guix manual says:
Guix is compatible with Nix, so it is possible to share […]
Unless somebody objects, I'd like to (wait for it) nix this
from the
manual entirely.
I don’t object to removing it. In fact, I’d be happy to see it
vanish.
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution. writes:
> The Guix manual says:
>> Guix is compatible with Nix, so it is possible to share the same
>> store between
>> both. To do so, you must pass configure not only the same
>> --with-store-dir
>> value, but
Pjotr Prins 写道：
It is safe[r?] to use two stores and two daemons. Virtue of
isolation :)
I agree. There is no advantage to sharing the store that I can
imagine is worth the risk and burden of compiling your entire Guix
or Nix world from scratch because you can't use substitutes.
The Guix m
Hi Daniel,
Nix and Guix are quite different even though they share the same root.
I used Nix for 10-odd years until I discovered GNU Guix.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:13:05AM +0200, Daniel Schäfer wrote:
> How much of that is still true? The daemon is not compatible anymore and
> I don't think it
Hi all,
I've been using NixOS for a few years and now I want to try out Guix.
The goal is to see whether there is a benefit to using both and what we can
learn from each other.
Last year Ludo wrote:
> Is compatibility with the nix-daemon a goal of the Guix project?
I’ve come to the conclusion
