Hi,
Timothy Sample writes:
> AFAIK, we are OK to use the wip-haskell branch. I will reset it to
> master and get started today or tomorrow.
I just pushed GHC 8.8 to wip-haskell-updates, which I reset to
core-updates. (I’m betting that core-updates will be merged before the
Haskell updates are
Hi John,
I’m just catching up on the list after a long hiatus, so sorry for the
wait.
John Soo writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> Stackage and ghc have moved quite a bit since our stackage and ghc
> versions. Would it be ok to start work on bumping our package set to
> a newer set of working packages and
Hi John,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 21:58, John Soo wrote:
> Stackage and ghc have moved quite a bit since our stackage and ghc versions.
> Would it be ok to start work on bumping our package set to a newer set of
> working packages and compilers? What is the state of the wip-haskell branch?
T
Hi Guix,
Stackage and ghc have moved quite a bit since our stackage and ghc versions.
Would it be ok to start work on bumping our package set to a newer set of
working packages and compilers? What is the state of the wip-haskell branch?
Kindly,
John
