Hi,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
>> donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing resources for the Guix build
>> farm:
>>
>> https://github.com/WorksOnArm/cluster/issues/2
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 02:43:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
> donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing resources for the Guix build
> farm:
>
> https://github.com/WorksOnArm/cluster/issues/254
Unfortunately our request was no
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 04:28:28PM -0500, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
> I'm extremely happy to see this, and I hope we can increase our ARM
> capacity. Thanks for making this submission, Leo!
Thank you so much for your support!
Leo Famulari writes:
> As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
> donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing resources for the Guix build
> farm:
>
> https://github.com/WorksOnArm/cluster/issues/254
I'm extremely happy to see this, and I hope we can increase our ARM
capa
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 16:25 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I will keep this in mind, pending their reply.
>
> The ticket system automatically added the tag 'hardware/ampere-
> altra'.
> So, it may be a case of "we can have any CPU we want, as long as it's
> an
> Ampere ALTRA"... as Henry Ford said,
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:56:03AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> You might want to also ask for hardware that has the extensions for
> 32-bit arm, if we also want to improve substitute availability for armhf
> too. The 32-bit extensions are optional for aarch64, and thus not all
> hardware supp
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:57:41PM +0200, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:
> Hi! There's a typo: "dinary distros" -> binary
>
> also, extra 'this' in: this goal this for x86
Thanks! Fixed :)
Leo Famulari writes:
> Those of us who watch the Guix build farm [0] closely have identified
> the lack of capacity for building ARM binaries as a serious limitation.
>
> As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
> donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing resources for t
On 2021-04-02, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Those of us who watch the Guix build farm [0] closely have identified
> the lack of capacity for building ARM binaries as a serious limitation.
>
> As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
> donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing res
Those of us who watch the Guix build farm [0] closely have identified
the lack of capacity for building ARM binaries as a serious limitation.
As part of our efforts to improve the situation, I've applied for
donation of aarch64 (64-bit ARM) computing resources for the Guix build
farm:
https://git
10 matches
Mail list logo
